Volume 98, Issue 9 p. 2671-2680
Feature Article

The Compelling Case for Indentation as a Functional Exploratory and Characterization Tool

David B. Marshall

David B. Marshall

Teledyne Scientific Co, Thousand Oaks, California, 91360

Search for more papers by this author
Robert F. Cook

Robert F. Cook

Materials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899

Search for more papers by this author
Nitin P. Padture

Nitin P. Padture

School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, 02912

Search for more papers by this author
Michelle L. Oyen

Michelle L. Oyen

Department of Engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ UK

Search for more papers by this author
Antonia Pajares

Antonia Pajares

Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Energética y de los Materiales, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, 06006 Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Jodie E. Bradby

Jodie E. Bradby

Research School of Physics and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601 Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ivar E. Reimanis

Ivar E. Reimanis

Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, 80401

Search for more papers by this author
Rajan Tandon

Rajan Tandon

Analytical Technologies, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87185

Search for more papers by this author
Trevor F. Page

Trevor F. Page

School of Chemical Engineering and Advanced Materials, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU UK

Search for more papers by this author
George M. Pharr

George M. Pharr

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996

Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 37831

Search for more papers by this author
Brian R. Lawn

Corresponding Author

Brian R. Lawn

Materials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 July 2015
Citations: 65

Abstract

The utility of indentation testing for characterizing a wide range of mechanical properties of brittle materials is highlighted in light of recent articles questioning its validity, specifically in relation to the measurement of toughness. Contrary to assertion by some critics, indentation fracture theory is fundamentally founded in Griffith–Irwin fracture mechanics, based on model crack systems evolving within inhomogeneous but well-documented elastic and elastic–plastic contact stress fields. Notwithstanding some numerical uncertainty in associated stress intensity factor relations, the technique remains an unrivalled quick, convenient and economical means for comparative, site-specific toughness evaluation. Most importantly, indentation patterns are unique fingerprints of mechanical behavior and thereby afford a powerful functional tool for exploring the richness of material diversity. At the same time, it is cautioned that unconditional usage without due attention to the conformation of the indentation patterns can lead to overstated toughness values. Limitations of an alternative, more engineering approach to fracture evaluation, that of propagating a precrack through a “standard” machined specimen, are also outlined. Misconceptions in the critical literature concerning the fundamental nature of crack equilibrium and stability within contact and other inhomogeneous stress fields are discussed.