Volume 106, Issue 1 p. 722-737
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Influences of powder morphology on the densification and microstructure of a ZrO2-based nanocrystalline glass–ceramic

Le Fu

Corresponding Author

Le Fu

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China

Correspondence

Le Fu, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, 932 Lushan Road, Yuelu District, Changsha 410083, China.

Email: fule2019@csu.edu.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Lei Li

Lei Li

State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yongxin Cheng

Yongxin Cheng

Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Unstable and Stable Species, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese, Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Bohan Wang

Bohan Wang

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China

Search for more papers by this author
Hui Wu

Hui Wu

State Key Laboratory of New Ceramics and Fine Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 September 2022

Abstract

Morphology is an important characteristic of raw powder utilized for ceramic sintering but the role of powder morphology is mostly overlooked. In this study, two types of ZrO2–SiO2 powder with different morphologies (fiber and particle) were synthesized by blow spinning and sol–gel method, respectively, followed by direct current electric field-assisted hot pressing (FAHP) to obtain nanocrystalline glass–ceramics (NCGCs). Results showed that the two as-synthesized powders had different pyrolysis behaviors. The two types of as-synthesized powders were amorphous and tetragonal-ZrO2 nanocrystallites first formed after calcination at 800°C. During FAHP, the particle powder can be densified at a lower temperature than that of the fiber powder, due to the facts that the particle powder showed higher specific surface area and higher densification driving force. The fiber powder was predominately densified by fiber fusion and plastic deformation, whereas the particle powder was densified via particle fusion. Both the two types of powder can be fully densified to obtain ZrO2–SiO2 NCGCs at 1230°C for 4 min. Tetragonal-ZrO2 nanocrystallites in the NCGCs with particles as raw powder showed higher stability than those in the NCGCs with fibers as raw powder.